Forest Encroachment and Evictions

in Madhya Pradesh

 

 

Madhya Pradesh has an area of Approximately 95 lakh hectares under teak, sal and miscellaneous forests, which constitutes approximately 15 percent of the forest area of the country.

 

Clearing or breaking up forest land or attempting to do so for agriculture or for any other purpose, is prohibited under Section 26 (h) of the Indian Forest Act (1927) and is punishable by imprisonment for one year. Further, Section 63 of the Act also prescribes the alteration, moving, destroying or defacing of boundary marks of any forests. Forest officers have been empowered by Section 80 (A) of the Indian Forest Act (1927) to remove forest encroachments after giving the affected persons reasonable opportunity of being heard.

 

People living in the forest areas, especially the tribal, are generally dependent on marginal agriculture for their survival. Because of the lack of adequate rural development and economic opportunities in the remote areas, rural people have developed a tendency to cultivate forestland depending upon the needs of the family. The National Forest Policy recognized this practice and even advised the government to release that cultivable land for agriculture wherever demanded, although the 1988 Policy has expressed concern at the increasing trend in forest encroachments and has advised the state not to regularize them. Although the forest policy in independent India has, of necessity, been one of consolidating forest land, the tradition of cultivating forest land as and when necessary has persisted among the tribal communities, even at the risk of conflicting with the prevalent laws. Recognizing the cultivation of forest land for subsistence cultivation as a traditional socio-economic activity, the successive state governments have regularized forest encroachments from time to time, since fifties. But with the promulgation of Forest (Conservation) Act 1980, regularization of encroachment has been prohibited unless the state government had taken a decision prior to 1980 to this effect.

 

 

Regularization of pre-1980 encroachment

 

The GOI issued guidelines for the containment of forest encroachments vide their circular dated 18.9.1990 and prescribed the criterion for the regularization of pre-1980 encroachments. The state government has regularized 44367.29 hectares encroachments, involving 35596 encroachers, in the undivided Madhya Pradesh, with the approval of GOI, and has been further pursuing the question of settlement of nearly 90560.77 hectares of forest encroachment, involving 70141 encroachers who occupied these lands prior to 24th October 1980 and has obtained partial clearance under Indian Forest (Conservation) Act 1980. The Hon’ able Supreme Court has directed in its order dated 22.9.2000, in IA no. 424(WP 202/95, T N Godaverman Vs UOI) that the conditions imposed by GOI for regularization of encroachments should be fulfilled prior to regularization. Nearly 78.2 percentage of the pre-1980 encroachers are tribals while 5.1 percent are scheduled caste people.

 

Post-1980 encroachments

 

While the state stands committed to stop further encroachment of forestland, it is also enjoined to evacuate all the post 1980 encroachments from forestlands. However, in view of the socio-economic nature of the problem and the sensitivity of the society to the issues involving tribals, the state agencies hesitate to use the force required to evict the encroachers in a sustained manner. In spite of the problems, the state has evicted encroachments from an area of approximately 50,000 hectares involving nearly 15,000 persons, up to December 2002. As on December 2002 the forest area occupied by the encroachers (post-1980) is estimated to be approximately 138110.585 hectares involving nearly 92,000 persons. Due to the strengthened vigil maintained by the field officers, the area under encroachments has actually come down in the last two years, and the state is determined to maintain this trend.

 

Although forest encroachments are generally believed to be a socio-economic problems involving local tribal communities but it has many other implications as well such as :

v      In some sensitive areas, certain activist organizations have come up who encourage local people to encroach open forest land and incite them to forcibly oppose the legal action taken by the government officials. They even encourage people to lodge false complaints, as a part of the strategy, against forest staff, to discourage them from taking effective action

v      Although encroachments are a problem in all the forest areas, some districts such as Burhanpur, Khargone, Badwani, DHar, Jhabua, Guna and Vidisha etc. are relatively more sensitive. A majority of the encroachers in many of these districts are reported to be outsiders (coming from other districts) rather than local tribal

v      There are many influential people, locally called Navadia Patels, who are reported to charge a fee from every encroacher in exchange for this protection

v      The annual rate of fresh encroachments has been approximately 5000-6000 hectares which results in the illegal felling of nearly 200,000 trees, apart from other adverse effects on the environment. This is a major cause of deforestation in the state and society has to find a way to deal with this issue

v      It is generally claimed by many VOs that most of the people being evicted as post-1980 days. To rule out any such cases the state has set up district level committees, consisting of forest, revenue and tribal department officials, to identify any such cases, as advised by GOI in their letter dated 30.10.2002. The deadline for these committees has expired twice but no eligible cases have been identified in any of the ten districts from which reports have been received so far

v      It is also believed that due to the repeated regularization of encroachments in the past, people are encouraged to attempt encroachment in the hope that these will be regularized one day. Despite this risk, the state government is compelled to settle old encroachers in view of the socio-economic implications of the issues

v      Whereas forest officers are duty-bound to prevent and evict forest encroachments and can be preceded against if they do not. However, the sympathy of society normally goes in favor of the encroachers because most of the encroachers are tribal. This generates hesitation in the minds of lower officials in taking effective action

v      The Indian Forest Act provides for an imprisonment for one year for offences involving forest encroachments, but the courts tend to take a very lenient view and people get away with very minor punishment from the courts. Even if convicted, people do not vacate these encroachments and forest department is expected to use force to claim in the land in favor of government

v      The forest officials are usually vulnerable to prosecution under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act due to false complaints lodged by the encroachers

v      Because encroachments take place in a number of stages starting with demarcation, bush cutting, girdling, felling, ploughing, sowing etc. and because of the dynamic (and seasonal) nature of the activity, it is difficult to have an exact estimate of the land actually occupied by the encroachers. In many cases, the encroachers tend to occupy the same piece of land again and again and the same piece of land also is accounted more than once in the computation of the affected area

v      It is generally claimed by VOs, with a vested interest in acquiring a constituency among the tribals, that the government is evicting the tribals from the lands traditionally occupied by them, which is not true. All lands traditionally occupied by the people for cultivation were left out of the forest blocks at the time of demarcation and notification of forest areas and the areas under encroachment is government property in the custody of forest department

v      The state government of Madhya Pradesh has constituted a district level task force under the chairmanship of district collector, with the DFO and superintendent of police as members, to protect the forest resources against encroachment and illicit felling. These officers taken wherever necessary. Government officials are subject to the laws of the land and are strictly prohibited from using highhanded methods in the discharge of their forest protection related duties

v      The GOI had directed the states, vide their letter dated 3.5.2002, to evict all post-1980 encroachments by 30th September 2002. The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) constituted by the Supreme Court, in the Writ Petition no 202/95, has recommended the same deadline to the Hon’ble Court. The state has been successful in clearing nearly 10,000 hectares since January 2002. However, in view of the socio economic nature of the problem, and the involvement of the tribals and other weaker sections of the society, the government believes that simply evicting the encroachers, without a proper rehabilitation programme, will neither be proper nor effective. Even if they are evicted from one place, they many encroach forest land some where else and may even indulge in other criminal activities. The state government has informed the Hon’ble Supreme Court in IA no 703, in the writ petition no 202/95, that the state would like GOI to provide funds for preparing and implementing a rehabilitation package for evicted encroachers

v      The above IA is still pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and is likely to come up for hearing soon. The State will take further necessary action on the basis of the directions of the Hon’ble Court

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

overview of administrative process for settlement operation between 1990 to 2004

 

 

s.no.

 

 

Details of the Memorandum

 

Subject

1

Issued by GOI dated 18.09.1990

Instructions given for resolving disputed cases during forest land settlement

2

Issued by GOI dated 18.09.1990

Guidelines for survey and settlement

3

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 21.04.1994

Instructions for joint survey of forest & revenue departments

4

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 05,12.1995

Asked to submit a report on actions taken on the basis of previous notifications for GOI

5

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 06.04.1996

Submitted proposal for Jabalpur District

6

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 21.08.1996

Submitted proposal for Betul District

7

Issued by Minister Environment & Forest MP GOV dated 29.11.1995

Instructions for taking time bound action for settlement

8

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 02.02.1996

Submitted proposal for conversion of Forest village to Revenue villages in Khargone District

9

Official letter from Chief Minister to Prime Minister about regularization dated 03.02.1996

Request for permission for taking regularization action pre-1980 possession

10

Official letter from Chief Minister to Forest Minister about regularization dated 22.02.1996

Request for permission about pre-1980 settlement and conversion of forest villages

11

Official letter from Chief Minister to Prime Minister about regularization dated 23.02.1996

Request for permission for taking regularization action pre-1980 possession

12

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 20.03.1996

Proposal for regularization of settlement in Rajnandgaon District

13

Issued by GOI dated 17.06.1996

Instructions for submission of specific information about encroachment

14

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 31.12.1996

Forest Secretary submitted records and requesting to Secretary MoEF for given permission for pre-1980 encroachment

15

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 31.12.1996

Forest Secretary submitted records and requesting to Secretary MoEF for given permission for pre-1980 encroachment

16

Presented to Prime Minister by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 17.06.1997

Requesting for given permission for settlement of pre-1980 cases 

17

Presented to Prime Minister by Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh dated 04.11.1997

Requesting for issuing instructions about pre-1980 settlement process

18

Issued by GOI dated 09.06.1998

Informing State about official proceedings and complaining about due compensatory forestry

19

Issued by MoEF dated 16.06.1998

Complaining State about due compensatory forestry

20

Submission of Chief Minister to MoEF dated 13.01.1999

Requesting for giving permission for compensatory forestry

21

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 21.07.1999

Submission of plan for compensatory forestry to the MoEF

22

Issued by GOI dated 05.10.1999

MoEF asking for submission of documentary proofs of pre-1980 encroachment and sueesting for compensatory forestry

23

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 12.11.1999

Submission of answers with reference to the letter issued by MoEF dated 05.10.1999

24

Submission of Chief Minister to Cabinet Minister of Tribal Welfare dated 28.12.1999

Requesting for taking decision of settlement of pre-1980 encroachments

25

Submission of Chief Minister to Cabinet Minister of Social Justice dated 28.12.1999

Requesting for taking decision of settlement of pre-1980 encroachments

26

Issued by GOI dated 11.01.2000

Asking for submission of required information for pre-1980 encroachers

27

Issued by GOI dated 27.01.2000

Asking for submission of required information for pre-1980 encroachers

28

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 12.02.2000

Submission by State to the GOI on following lines

29

Issued by Madhya Pradesh Government dated 15.12.2000

Submission by State about planning of compensatory forestry for pre-1980 settlement

30

Issued by GOI dated 23.02.2000

Informing MoEF about proceedings of Supreme Court which prohibit the regularization process of pre-1980 encroachers

31

Issued by GOI dated 05.07.2000

GOI specify the State for sending a parallel proposal for settlement of pre-1976 possession/encroachment and further re-submission of new proposal for the period of 01.01.1977 to 06.03.1979

32

Issued by PCCF (Land Settlement) dated 09.06.2000

Re-submission of proposal

33

Issued by Minister of Forest (MP) to Cabinet Minister of Forest dated 17.07.2000

Requesting for issuing circular after the formal announcement of Cabinet Minister of Forest GOI

34

Submission by Chief Minster to the Prime Minister dated 24.08.2000

Requesting for comprehensive review of Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and conversion of Forest Villages to the Revenue Villages

35

Issued by National Commission of Scheduled Tribes & Scheduled Castes dated 10.05.2001

Specify for organizing a high level meeting for discussion the economic support for compensatory forestry by Ministry of Tribal Welfare GOI

36

Issued by GOI dated 28.05.2001

Detailed instructions about (a) conditional approval for settlement of pre-1976 encroachment along with compensatory forestry (b) theoretical approval for settlement of encroachers falls under dated 01.01.1977 to 06.03.1979 with the condition of resurvey for eligible encroachments (c) disagreement for settlement of encroachers in forest areas thereof 25.10.1980